Qualifying commercial lease
The landlord must have a qualifying lease of commercial premises and the statutory commercial-premises test must be satisfied.
Commercial landlord decision guide · England and Wales
The first question is not “which remedy is stronger?” It is what outcome the landlord actually wants. CRAR is designed to recover qualifying commercial rent while the lease continues. Forfeiture is designed to recover possession where a valid and unwaived right to forfeit has arisen.
Direct answer
Choose CRAR where recovering qualifying commercial rent is the objective and the landlord intends to treat the lease as continuing.
Consider lease forfeiture where recovering possession is the objective and the lease gives the landlord a presently exercisable right to forfeit.
Recover the rent
Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery allows a landlord of qualifying commercial premises to recover qualifying rent using the statutory taking-control-of-goods procedure without first obtaining judgment for that rent.
The lease continues. If payment is not made after the statutory Notice of Enforcement, a certificated enforcement agent may attend and take control of qualifying goods.
View the CRAR service →Recover the premises
Lease forfeiture seeks to determine the commercial lease and recover possession where the landlord has a valid right of re-entry or forfeiture that has arisen and remains available.
In suitable circumstances this may be exercised through peaceable re-entry. Lease wording, breach, waiver, occupation, insolvency and notice requirements must be checked first.
View the lease forfeiture service →Side-by-side comparison
The same rent arrears can raise both remedies, but the legal effect and commercial objective are very different.
| Question | CRAR | Lease forfeiture |
|---|---|---|
| Main objective | Recover qualifying commercial rent. | Recover possession of the premises. |
| What happens to the lease? | The landlord treats the lease as continuing. | The landlord seeks to determine the lease, subject to possible relief from forfeiture. |
| Court order required first? | Not normally, where the statutory CRAR requirements are satisfied. | Not necessarily. Peaceable re-entry may be available in a suitable commercial case. |
| What debt can be recovered? | Qualifying commercial rent as defined by the CRAR legislation. | Forfeiture is a possession remedy rather than a debt-recovery mechanism. |
| Service charge or insurance? | Outside CRAR even if labelled “rent” in the lease. | May form part of a non-rent breach analysis, potentially engaging Section 146. |
| Tenant normally remains? | Yes. The objective is rent recovery. | No. The objective is recovery of possession. |
| Key risk | Using CRAR may waive an existing right to forfeit. | Wrongful forfeiture can expose the landlord to challenge, relief proceedings or damages. |
When CRAR fits
It is not a general mechanism for collecting every sum due under a commercial lease.
The landlord must have a qualifying lease of commercial premises and the statutory commercial-premises test must be satisfied.
CRAR applies to rent for possession and use of the premises. Service charges, insurance and other ancillary sums are excluded.
The net unpaid rent must be at least the statutory minimum equivalent to seven days' rent at the relevant calculation points.
When forfeiture fits
Rent arrears alone do not make every commercial lease suitable for immediate peaceable re-entry.
The lease should contain an applicable forfeiture or right-of-re-entry provision and the contractual trigger must have occurred.
Non-payment of rent and breaches of other lease covenants should not automatically be treated in the same way.
The landlord's conduct after learning of the breach should be reviewed before forfeiture is attempted.
Residential, mixed or disputed occupation can materially affect whether peaceable re-entry is lawful or appropriate.
Section 146 generally applies to many breaches other than non-payment of rent and may need to be satisfied before forfeiture.
Critical decision point
Yes. Where a right to forfeit has already arisen, exercising CRAR is capable of amounting to an election to treat the lease as continuing.
The Court of Appeal confirmed in Brar v Thirunavukkrasu [2019] EWCA Civ 2032 that exercising CRAR waived the landlord's existing right to forfeit in the circumstances of that case.
Demanding or accepting rent after knowledge of a breach may also raise waiver issues. The precise effect depends on the breach and the landlord's conduct.
Practical point: if recovering possession may be the preferred outcome, consider forfeiture rights before instructing CRAR or taking another step that recognises the lease as continuing.
Other issues that can change the route
Service charges, insolvency, subtenants and non-rent breaches can each alter the available enforcement route.
Service charges and other ancillary lease sums fall outside CRAR and may need a contractual, pre-action or court-based route.
Administration, liquidation, moratoriums or bankruptcy can restrict whether CRAR or forfeiture can start or continue.
Where CRAR is available against the immediate tenant, Section 81 may provide a separate rent-redirection route against a subtenant.
Non-rent breaches
Section 146 is a separate part of the commercial lease enforcement decision and is commonly relevant where the breach is something other than non-payment of rent.
For many breaches of covenant other than non-payment of rent, section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 prevents enforcement of a right of re-entry or forfeiture until the landlord has served a notice specifying the breach.
Where the breach is capable of remedy, the notice must require it to be remedied. The legislation also addresses compensation and requires a reasonable period to be allowed before the right is enforced.
Serving the notice does not itself forfeit the lease.
Before choosing a remedy
These questions usually identify whether the case is mainly about payment, possession or another lease breach.
If yes, and qualifying rent is owed, CRAR may be relevant. If no, consider whether a valid right to forfeit has arisen.
Separate rent from service charge, insurance, rates and other lease liabilities before deciding whether CRAR is available.
Check the lease and actual occupation. Residential or mixed use can materially change the position.
If so, consider waiver before demanding or accepting rent, exercising CRAR or otherwise treating the lease as continuing.
If so, Section 146 and other lease-specific requirements may need to be addressed before forfeiture is considered.
Related commercial landlord guidance
This decision page sits at the centre of the commercial-property cluster. The linked pages deal with the specific enforcement route or risk.
Commercial landlord questions
Primary legal sources
Operational review
Craig Whinray is Director of UK Bailiff Services Ltd and a Certificated Enforcement Agent with more than 20 years' frontline enforcement experience.
This decision guide is informed by UK Bailiffs' commercial rent and possession work and the primary sources referenced above. It does not replace legal advice where waiver, insolvency, lease construction, occupation or the right to forfeit is disputed or uncertain.
Editorial owner: UK Bailiff Services Ltd · Last reviewed 3 October 2026 · Review following material legal or operational change and at least annually.Send us the lease, current rent statement and basic occupation details. We can identify the operational route, highlight missing information and flag issues that need legal advice before attendance.